ABSTRACT
While care models adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic with virtual and hybrid visits, clinical factors associated with treatment changes among ambulatory pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients are not well characterized. To understand which data critically altered treatment recommendations, we conducted a retrospective review among ambulatory children with Group 1 PAH to determine optimal visit and diagnostic strategies. Changes in management included: unplanned new treatments, dose modifications of vasodilators or diuretics, unscheduled hospitalizations, or changes to activity recommendations, catheterization schedule, or other testing. Factors prompting management changes were classified as symptoms, exam findings, or diagnostic tests. Across 398 ambulatory visits by 48 patients, 38 patients (79%) at 88 visits (22%) required change in management, most commonly in targeted PH medication. Changes were driven by symptoms alone (15%), diagnostic testing alone (47%), exam only (2%), symptoms and exam (2%), combination of testing and symptoms or testing and exam (25%), and other reasons (9%). Patients with World Health Organization functional Class IV (odds ratio [OR] 9.04 vs. Class I, p = 0.014) or Class III (OR 2.08 vs. Class I, p = 0.050) were more likely to undergo change in management. However, among Class I patients, 18% of visits generated changes in management because of test findings. While multiple factors affect management in ambulatory pediatric PH, neither symptoms nor exam was sufficient for identifying patients warranting clinical change in management. Testing accounted for most changes. Thus, in-person or hybrid surveillance including history, exam, and diagnostic testing remains essential for optimal management of pediatric PAH.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic impact on practicing physicians, with effects in clinical practice, academic pursuits, research endeavors, and personal lives. Women in medicine have been uniquely impacted. We examined the impact of the pandemic on the careers of pediatric cardiologists in the Northeast with an anonymous online survey. Participants reported demographic data, information on work hours, administrative burden, career satisfaction, academic productivity, and burnout. We approached 490 cardiologists and received 127 completed surveys (response rate 26%; 49% female). Among all respondents, 72% reported increased burnout, 43% reported decreased career satisfaction, and 57% reported decreased academic productivity. In multivariable ordinal regression analysis, when compared to male physicians, females were 2.4 times more likely to report decreased overall career satisfaction (p = 0.027), 2.6 times more likely to report decreased academic productivity (p = 0.028), and 2.6 times more likely to report increased feelings of burnout "to a large degree" (p = 0.022). Among all respondents, decreased career satisfaction was independently associated with increased household responsibility (OR = 4.4, p = 0.001). Increased administrative burden was independently associated with decreased academic productivity (OR = 2.6, p = 0.038). Open-ended responses highlighted loss of community due to remote work and blurring of the boundaries between work and home. Conversely, respondents appreciated flexibility to work remotely. In conclusion, the majority of pediatric cardiologists in the Northeast experienced negative career impacts due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Important gender differences emerged, with female physicians disproportionately reporting increased burnout, decreased career satisfaction, and decreased academic productivity.